Katrina “Gun Confiscation” – My Experience

Submitted by Brannon LeBouef

Executive Summary:

Yes, some guns were confiscated in New Orleans, LA (NOLA) following hurricane Katrina, but it was nowhere near as widespread as some would have you believe. They were isolated incidents and the majority of those were done by out of town LEO and MIL.

What you are about to read are my personal experiences and recollection of events as I saw them. While not all-inclusive, I think they lend a fiar account of what really happened on the ground.

Realities:

While it has been nearly 8 years since the events of Hurricane Katrina, which in my opinion currently serves as the closest controlled experiment of a SHTF scenario in this country that we have on record in recent times, many of the incidents or perceived incidents that occurred during that time are still being discussed. I was there, at least for the worst of it. Allow me to set the record straight on a few things….

  1. There were NOT sharks swimming down Canal St.
  2. There were bodies floating in the streets and abandoned on the roadways.
  3. There were people taking pot shots with rifles at rescue helicopters and patrolling law enforcement.
  4. There were NOT hundreds of people being killed and raped in the Superdome, convention center, or elsewhere, including infants and elderly alleged victims.
  5. There were people setting fire to malls and then shooting at the responding firemen.
  6. There were people shooting at the electrical lineman on the poles as they attempted to restore power.
  7. There were NOT Blackwater mercenaries patrolling the streets. They were there, but they were primarily at static posts guarding private business and governmental shelters and camps. They were security guards.
  8. There was looting of all kinds, by all kinds of people to include the police in very limited instances.
  9. There were NOT people eating each other.
  10. There was SEVERE ineptness and failure on the part of all levels of government as it relates to the response.

There was NOT widespread Gun Confiscation in New Orleans.  Wait what?

Who am I?

I feel it is important to tell you a little about myself in order to provide context and perspective to my statements as they relate to this topic. During Hurricane Katrina, I was on active duty with the United States Marine Corps and stationed in New Orleans, where I have lived for the last 15 years or so. I was also a reserve police officer with Gretna Police Department, which is located on what we call the “west bank” of the river. We ended up becoming the epicenter for the entire LEO response to the area after the storm due to the fact that we had secured our limited assess against destruction, both man-made and natural.  I resided in the city in the “uptown” section near Magazine St and Tchoupitoulas Ave. My USMC unit was on the other side of town in what was the rough beginning of New Orleans East. Between those spots, I saw most of the city and greater metro area.

The flooding was devastating leaving citizens to fend for themselves in many cases.

The flooding was devastating leaving citizens to fend for themselves in many cases.

I left the city on the Sunday before the storm hit and moved my then girlfriend and her child to Lafayette, LA. While there, we witnessed the storm hit and the levees break. I was able to communicate with my brother officers who were still there via Nextel Direct Connect at the time. They were under harassing fire and in short supply of ammunition.

I believe it was the Tuesday after the storm hit and the levee broke that I packed my truck with all the ammunition I had (which admittedly was a lot), and headed down home to see what I could do.

The following statements are paraphrases, anecdotal recollections of a very dangerous and trying time. My attempt is only to try and shed some first hand light onto what really happened for those first few weeks after the storm.

State of Confusion

Now, as this story relates to gun confiscation… yes, it happened. That said, it is not the widespread gun confiscation that is depicted in the media pieces. From a personal standpoint, I agree that one illegal gun confiscation is one too many, but let’s look at what really happened and attempt to view the incidents in context.

The entire area was in a state of complete and utter turmoil with not a single shred of command or control.  The New Orleans Chief of Police basically declared his own martial law (which is wrong), and the mayor was about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. We had New Orleans Police Officers who went rogue, abandoned their posts, killed themselves, were looting, and all other manner of behavior to deal with. As I was leaving Lafayette, I passed 3 NOPD units heading towards Lafayette.  All of the common social controls used to at least customarily identify the good guys from the bad were gone. Criminals were driving marked police cars, uniform and gun shops had been ransacked and pilfered. Other agencies had actually been involved in armed stand-offs with deviant NOPD officers. Yes, things were THAT bad.

Keep in mind, that by the end of that week, we also had several hundred National Guard, Marines, Army, and hundreds of out of state law enforcement officers, “aid workers”, media, etc. running around with very little control and accountability.

A call for help spray painted on the side of the house.  The orange paint signifies a LEO response and marks the house as secure.

A call for help spray painted on the side of a house. The orange paint signifies a LEO response and marks the house as secure.

With that stated, the overwhelming majority of those who came down to help handled the chaos with a respectful professionalism and attention to duty, whose help and sacrifice was invaluable to those of us from the region… but that is not who we are here to talk about.

The Las Vegas Mentality:

Yes, guns were taken, but with my own eyes, the overwhelming majority of those criminal and unethical acts, which is still a small number, were done by out of state LEO and military. These military members were primarily 18-21 year old reservists who thought they were coming down to help fill sandbags and clean roadways, but were instead thrust into law enforcement roles with little training and even less leadership.

Among the bad eggs of the group, there was this mentality that grew out of the lack of accountability that I call the “Vegas Mentality” where they realized no one really knew who they were and the lack of command and control meant there was no real accountability. For those whose moral compass had began to wander, the environment created a “wild west” atmosphere. There were a couple of agencies that were thanked for their assistance and politely asked to go home. It was primarily these bad eggs, along with a couple of NOPD officers, who we see in the YouTube videos.

There were also a couple of individuals acting alone at some of the checkpoints. I know I encountered countless people with firearms and did not confiscate a single one, neither did any officer I knew or worked with. The only time firearms were seized were when someone was arrested for a crime—no different than before the rain.

Truth be told, that was the basic ROE if you will, for my agency and those I encountered, including the over 200 or so federal agents that were based out of our department for several weeks –

“Guys, BE SMART. BE SAFE. BE POLITE. People are in bad places physically, mentally, and financially. Do not push people, but do not allow yourself to be pushed. We operate under the same rules and policies as before the storm—only with fewer resources. If you would not have seized a firearm as evidence of a crime or incident to an arrest, don’t take it now.”

As it related to “looting” by the police, we were instructed that if the integrity of the building had been compromised by the storm, to go in and take what we needed, but do not make entry into secured buildings. We also had permission from the local supermarkets, Academy Sports, and several other businesses to take whatever we wanted for our use and to distribute to the community. That was immensely helpful.

National Guardsmen taking a break.

National Guardsmen taking a break.

I am paraphrasing the basic theme of our morning briefings before we headed out to countless looting calls, death calls from people suffocating, killing themselves, gunfire calls, etc. It also helped tremendously that our leadership made a decision to have all non-local LEO work static checkpoints and positions while those of us familiar with the areas, and most importantly the people, handled patrol and calls. Having some State Trooper from NY try and deal with a hot, hungry, and tired Cajun from the bayou is a recipe for chaos.

After the first couple weeks, many of the people arrested for looting were National Guard people. New Orleans had National Guard “troops”, basically young reservists serving their 2-week active time each year patrolling the streets in fully marked patrol cars for 2-YEARS! This was a huge problem, and I personally had to deal with them on traffic stops and various other calls. They simply were not trained or experienced to deal with the role they were thrust into.

Cops and Gun Control and following orders and keeping oaths and…

I have been fortunate enough to train, and train with, thousands of police officers across this country, all strata of jurisdiction, regional idiosyncrasies, and mindsets. I can tell you unequivocally that the OVERWELMING number of police officers will not take firearms from US citizens. Period.

Most of them are smart enough to know that they  are a citizen first and if it can happen to “them”, it can happen to “THEM” too. Also, we are seeing an uptick in the number of prior military service LEO’s and they actually take the constitution very seriously.

There will ALWAYS be those who will just “follow orders”, but widespread firearms confiscation will never happen. Even if we were to ignore the Constitutional elements of this argument, Paul Howe put it best based on the logical argument. Cops will not roll into a house KNOWN to have guns, simply to take them. Their lives and their families are more important than that.

Now, you give them an actual bona-fide bad guy, one they know is bad based on their own morals, and they will run through a hail of bullets to take him off the street. However, you ask us to go next door and take them from our hunting buddies and brother-in-laws… well, you just unified the largest and best armed group of individuals against the government.

If it is ever attempted in this country in a true large-scale confiscation, some cops will die. There will be an initial rise in violence and then it will settle as everyone figure out the rules. Cops will realize, like many are about the “Drug war”, that it simply is not worth it – in lives, money, or erosion of rights.

Brannon LeBouef is the owner and founder of NOLATAC Training and Consulting and The St Bernard indoor Shooting Center. Brannon is an 11-year veteran of the US Marine Corps, a 15 plus year veteran of law enforcement, a former private military security contractor, and professional firearms trainer. He can be reached at Brannon@nolatac.com or www.nolatacforum.com.

Photography by Brannon LeBouef

MAC

MAC is an avid shooter, former MCSF Marine, NRA member, Oath Keeper and is commissioned as a Colonel by the Governor of Kentucky. Known for his videos on the Military Arms Channel, he also writes for The Bang Switch, for Shotgun News (Be Ready!) and freelances for Guns & Ammo. MAC has been a life long shooter who has an interest in all things that go "bang" but gravitates towards military type firearms.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterFacebookGoogle PlusYouTube

  • Pingback: Katrina - A Cop Who Was There - INGunOwners()

  • Pingback: Hurricane Katrina and gun confiscation: A "New" Perspective - INGunOwners()

  • http://gravatar.com/jnazari Jonathan Nazari

    I do not think that this article addresses the key point of lawful citizens having their lawfully owned guns taken away by law-enforcement and military units. To say that it did not happen on a “widespread scale” is not to dispute that it did happen and to more than one person, in more than just one area. That’s the crux at the heart of the matter, and that is unchanged.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Jonathan, it appears as though you missed the point of my article. Guns are taken everyday from lawfully armed citizens. My point was that it was not that much different during Katrina. With the obvious exception of the highly publicized and focused videos seen on the media and YouTube, gun confiscation, as called for by our corrupt politicians, ultimately was an epic fail. Guys simply refused to do it outside of the handful of incidents seen in the media, which were not at any more of an increased rate than what is probably going to happen across the country this afternoon. Let me state once again, even one firearm illegally taken from someone is an injustice and needs to be addressed, but that is a different issue than addressing the alleged widespread “gun confiscation” that allegedly happened across the region during Katrina which was my intent.

      Hope that helps a little to clarify my point.

    • chuckles

      I live in a small East Texas town of about 2500. The deal here is we KNOW our law enforcement and where they live. If SHTF here and they decided t disarm us, their families and homes would be in jeopardy. That’s harsh, but that a fact. Many of these people are our friends and neighbors and we attend church with them. If an absolutely unconstitutional gun grab was ordered, I can assure anyone that it would be ignored. The County Sheriff here has already declared such in the local rag. What would happen in Houston, I don’t know, but I’ll bet word would spread quickly what was happening.
      As long as we have a few American left, we won’t lose all our guns, IMO. It’s when we give them up voluntarily that becomes the problem. They might get a few the first day, but the second day will be filled with bloodshed. Word travels quickly and most already know what side they will choose. IMO, The government believes we will comply like Australia or Britain.
      They would be wrong.

      • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

        Pretty much my point entirely.

  • http://snafu-solomon.blogspot.com/ Solomon

    spot on Jonathan!!!! for some reason, we’re seeing portions of the LEO community trying to tell us that its the other guy we have to worry about ..not them. the laughable thing is that this extends to EVERY agency and dept. talk to DEA and they’ll say no, you have to worry about ATF, ATF will tell you worry about Homeland Security etc etc etc…eventually they’ll blame the state, who will blame the city, who will blame the county and then it goes back up the chain.

    the facts are simple. do not trust law enforcement. do not broadcast the types of weapons that you have and don’t be lulled into a false sense of security regarding your right to keep and bear arms. they practice on civilian targets because we’re the enemy they’re getting ready to engage. we just need to have the courage to fire back.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      What targets should they use instead of “civilian” targets?

      • Chris

        He’s talking about the targets that were the cause of some uproar a while back…the kid, the pregnant lady, etc…not some generic “non-military” bullseye.

        • jla

          They use those targets for a reason. It doesn’t matter who is holding the gun pointed at you! Whether it is a pregnant woman, a 100 year old man or a 12 year old girl is irrelevant; if that person is pointing a gun at you with the intention to kill you, you had damn well better kill them first, or you’re ending your shift on a stainless steel slab down at the morgue! Those targets are used so that if a LEO ever finds himself in a situation like that for real he won’t hesitate & get himself killed. It’s not because they’re planning to go out & shoot a bunch of kids & pregnant women! For crying out loud people use your damn heads!

          Yes, there are some real dirtbag cops out there. And yes, here lately it does seem like their numbers are increasing, but by & large they are good people who are trying to do a good job.

      • john coward

        Basic survival tactics, who ever shoot first –>dead. SOP SURVIVAL shoot last,
        maybe you will beat 50 per cent survival. Five sea going containers stuff full of rifles.
        Who got all the pistols … guess no one. Twenty three dead bodies floating in water
        and only 5 or 7 reported shot with little round holes.
        May be ,no one to see big round whole.
        john coward, no guns , no ammo.

  • http://bugoutwhale.com shannon S.

    it has been changed and there has been a effort to make sure it does not happen..

    “The actions of the New Orleans police have inspired 13 states, including Louisiana, to enact laws to keep state and local officials from taking guns during a state of emergency, such as after a natural disaster or terrorist attack. President Bush also signed a bill in October that would penalize states financially for illegally confiscating guns during an emergency.” http://www.pewstates.org/projects/stateline/headlines/katrina-inspires-bans-on-gun-seizures-85899386883

    if im not mistaken gov. jindal also added that the officers who do confiscate illegally are subjected to personal liability lawsuits.

  • Don

    The author, LeBouef, is obviously a good ol’ boy, typical of the Cajuns I’ve known. They truly are the salt of the Earth. While he may be biased due to the defense of his profession, and although he is certainly in denial when it comes to the severity and number of constitutional violations … if we’re ever in a similar situation here in Central Texas, I’d welcome his assistance as an excellent LEO. (Hell, based on what I’ve read, he’d be good in command.)

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks for the kind words Don. I do however take issue with your opinion that I am “defending my profession.” I know you do not know me, but trust this– there is no greater critic of law enforcement than me. I have worked with the best and worst that LE has to offer. Furthermore, while I know it was not your intent, your statements call my integrity into question. I am not in denial. It is impossible to be in denial about one’s actual observations (at least in most cases). I am telling you what I experienced first hand. If anyone would be in denial, I would think it would be those who were not here.

      I know confiscations happened, I am not saying they did not, I am simply saying, like most things, the media sensationalized and blew them out of proportion. Then, with the current hate of the government, others jumped on the badwagon. BELIEVE ME, lessons were learned, and most were learned fromt he bottom up. I cannot promise not a single gun will be confiscated next time, but I can promise less will be. I know we quickly figured out who the good guys were and were happy they were armed.

      Hell, after things stabilized a little, I remember myself and a couple of other guys giving ammo and a couple mags to some people who needed it. I look at the gun confiscations that happened as a disruption in the system that quickly corrected itself once the people actually charged with doing it realized what was up.

      Please do not take this as aggressive or disrespectful. You and I and everyone else has every right, and I believe a responsibility, to hold all public servants accountable and to be cautiously suspicious of their actions, especially in the current climate. That said, you cannot think every cop is a bogey man out to get you. That simply is not the way it really is.

      I would also like to add, that all the LEO guys I worked with during that time, especially some of the T DPS guys and I think they were Houston SWAT, were straight up solid dudes. I have been through the application process in TCX when we were about to move there after the storm, and I hold TX LEA in very high regard. Also, all the guys I have trained out of TX seem to be a cut above a lot of other places, LA included in many regards.

      Take care Don, and stay safe brother.

  • Jess Green

    Overall VERY passionate AND informative as well as enlightening.
    As a peripherally connected citizen and NOT LEA, what is a “SHTF scenario”. Heard of most of the other acronyms, ya lost me on that one.

  • Gary Mitidiero

    With all due respect, as I can sense you’re sincere, this explanation has to be directed to those in command. Citizens really don’t care if the problem is caused by a rogue LEO, a fake LEO, or by a direct order from authority. I know there are countless dedicated LEO’s trying to do the best they can, but the sad reality is the profession has been degraded through political manipulation and corruption. Officers are recruited for the wrong reason and then used for the wrong reason (revenue production, etc.). You really can’t blame the general public for distrusting them and not respecting them – their track record is dismal at best. The cleanup needs to start at the top and work its way down. Once the LEO has earned the respect of the citizenry by doing the job law abiding people want, isolated incidents will be dealt with properly.
    Reading between the lines (possibly wrongly) it looks as though you encountered LEO’s acting improperly. How many did you arrest? Or, did you honor the code amongst LEO’s to NEVER arrest their brethren? Through prior experiences these men knew they would get away with it with no repercussions.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Gary, that is a very good point. When it comes to leadership in law enforcement, with very few exceptions, i do not consider them police officers as much as politicians. MOST cops have the same issues with police leadership that non-LEO have.

      Did I arrest cops during Katrina? That is kind of a loaded question. WIthout going into great detail, we “arrested” very few people because we had no jails, You were basically escorted out of whomever’s jurisdiction you were in.

      I did not personally witness any LEO doing things that I consider arrestable. I do know some LEO were in fact arrested, though admittedly some time after the fact once things stabilized and the incidents could be investigated. SOme of the more notable incidents would be the Danziger bridge case as well as the Graves killing. Google them.

      Like I stated, what I was aware of were out of state LEO, and they were basically told to leave and not come back. We did arrest several military members for looting and things like that.

      For the record, there is no “never arrest a cop” rule. Cops get arrested all the time. FUrthermore, cops are the MOST self-policing (pun intended) group of people above even clergy. I would like to think it is due to generally high integrity, but I am sure the fact that you never know who is IA and who would sell you out helps. Add in the prolific use of cameras, and police corruption is not nearly as bad as the media would have you believe.

      • Dave
        • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

          Dave, you can pull examples of bad cops all day long. I never said they did not exist. In fact, I have repeated admitted and admonished negative behavior.

          If you are not going to actually read what I post before replying, this will nto be a very fruitful exchange.

    • Matt

      Gary, “the code” you refer to is not as strong as you may think it is. In my experience, it might get you out of a traffic ticket, it is not going to get you out of serious charges. In my career, I have been involved with many an instance where fellow LEO’s were arrested, and on more than one occasion, they have even been members of my own department. And when I said “might” I meant it, just a few months ago, the Sheriff of Sacramento County in CA was cited for speeding by a California Highway Patrol officer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/metalius.shaperium Metalius Shaperium

    Thanks Brannon for that on site report. Several things stand out in my mind as needing clarification.

    1. “However, you ask us to go next door and take them from our hunting buddies and brother-in-laws” OK. What about people you don’t know? What about outside LE? Would you stop them?

    2. “well, you just unified the largest and best armed group of individuals against the government.” I would say that the armed American people ARE the largest and best armed group….not LE.

    3. “If it is ever attempted in this country in a true large-scale confiscation, some cops will die. There will be an initial rise in violence and then it will settle as everyone figure out the rules.” Many will die. LE will become personae non gratae in many communities. What “rules”? The rules of confiscation? Then it’s OK with rules?

    4. “Cops will realize, like many are about the “Drug war”, that it simply is not worth it – in lives, money, or erosion of rights.” LE Still enforces the law on drugs. LE seems to be following orders just fine on that.

    I am not knocking you here. Just looking for clarity.

    Best, Metalius

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Metalius, thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts.

      1. I meant that as a metaphor as well as literally. LEO work within their own communities. The people they would be approaching are their family, friends, co-workers, their child’s homeroom teacher, their mechanic, people they went to high school with, etc. They are all “known” to some degree. More importantly, the LEO is known to those people, such in as where they live, etc. Paul Howe did a better job of illustrating this point here:

      http://blog.wilsoncombat.com/paul-howe/2nd-amendment-and-the-kool-aid-drinkers-by-paul-howe/

      2. Fair enough. Good point.

      3. No, I mean the first few will die and then the cops will stop because they do not want to die, especially based on orders that are not justified from guys who are not putting themselves at risk. I think the overwhelming majority would simply refuse. Look at all the Sheriff’s that are becoming vocal. You do not hear it from Chiefs of Police because they are political pawns. Sheriff’s are elected and are free to speak their mind, which is in support of the people.

      The rules are that if you come for my gun, you will die. The cops that decide to “follow orders” will figure out the rules real quick. The political powers will be powerless without the pawns to carry out their bidding.

      4. That is a completely different ball of wax. It is a lot easier to rally people against drugs, smoking, abortion, etc than guns. Guns are a constitutional right specifically called out. Weed is not. Let’s not go down this road.

      Hope that helps.

  • Brian

    Definitely interesting and informative. You definitely can’t trust everything you see on TV. He makes a valid point. No smart cop is gonna charge into a house of a lawful citizen that they know is loaded to the teeth.

  • http://Geardoh.wordpress.com SD

    The fact still remains that the confiscation of firearms happened. This article repeatedly frames this fact in a “yes, but” manner, which is wholly unhelpful. It was an illegal and unjustifiable act. Period. Rather than address the actual size and scope of the confiscation, backed up by figures and numbers, we’re being told that there were there were acts of professionalism and good, which somehow counterbalances the confiscations. According to various sources, figures of confiscated firearms range between 500 and 1000. I’m sure some percentage of those were seizures from criminals or abandoned dwellings, but that still leaves the likelihood that hundreds of firearms were still confiscated illegally from the law-abiding. Are we to believe your story that somehow the good makes up for the wrongs? We understand that firearms are confiscated from alleged criminals everyday. That isn’t the issue. The issue is that firearms were taken from law-abiding citizens with no seizure receipt or proper documentation. In a lawless, “wild west” situation, is that not the time where firearms are most needed?

    This article also does little to allay the fears of future confiscation. The author may be a “good guy”, but police brutality and unaccountability are rising, backed by a corrupt system of judges who favor the men in blue. California just passed a law last month allowing government to confiscate firearms based on “mental illness”. When will that mean those who distrust government and labeled as paranoid anti-establishmentarians? If law enforcement agencies and officers want the trust of the populace, said organizations and individuals need to speak up in unequivocal, unrelenting, and public opposition. However, it still remains that if it can happen in New Orleans, it can happen anywhere, legal or otherwise.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      SD,

      There are no figures and numbers. There were not census takers following all the cops. ALl we have are first hand accounts and anecdotal information. Sorry, wish I could be more helpful.

      I never said the good makes up for the wrongs. Please do not put words into my mouth.
      Please reread the article as well as my responses. Firearms are confiscated through illegal arrests for open carry, concealed carry traffic stops, etc everyday in this country. My over riding point was that it was not at a higher rate necessarily during Katrina… it just got more attention because it was concentrated and a public statement…. which was wrong. (no but)

      My goal is not to “allay your fears”. Only you control your fear and I do not have the power to stop anything. I was simply trying to relay my experiences through an event that happened in the past. It appears you are taking the article out of context and attempting to hold it to a standard it was never intended to meet.

      Anything can always happen anywhere. That is a fact. I am simply telling you what you already know… the media lies. Do with that information what you will.

    • Dave

      Exactly. The typical LEO dismissive, self-justifying attitude isn’t helpful at all. Especially since we’re talking about violating people’s Constitutional rights under color of law.

      Oh wow, you told them to go away? Great! So if I’m caught stealing firearms, I can expect to be told to just go home?

      Sorry Brannon. Your own comments are a tacit admission of the blatant double standard that exists. LEO’s and NG’s who stole people’s weapons should have been jailed for several years, not told to “go home.” You occupy a position of great trust. We’ve given you a badge and a gun, with the authority to take people’s freedom, and potentially their lives.

      When that trust is abused, when you misuse your authority to deprive someone else of their property/freedom/life, you shouldn’t just be reprimanded. You should be forced to repay what was taken, measure for measure.

      Take someone’s guns? You’re going to prison for grand larceny. Take them at gunpoint? Armed robbery charges too.

      Take someone’s freedom under false arrest, like that Utah State Trooper Lisa Steed? You’re going to spend a month in prison for every minute your victims were behind bars, and you’ll repay any financial damages they incurred as a result of your abuse of power. Non-dischargeable in bankruptcy court, naturally.

      Take someone’s life, like Johannes Mehserle? Time for a nice, long dirt nap.

      Don’t give us this stuff about law enforcement being the most self-policing profession in the world. Until we have color-of-law enhancements for charges filed against LEO’s who abuse their authority (instead of “go home” slaps on the wrist), your entire profession can safely be assumed to be above the law.

      • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

        Dave, I do not think you fully realize that there was no physical way to place people in custody for about two weeks.

        Secondly, you completely ignore where i stated I did not see any cop do anything that warranted an arrest.

        If you choose to ignore facts in place of your contempt and hatred, that is your choice.

        I agree with most of what you posted that should happen to ANYONE, even police when they break the law. You just willfully refuse to place your hatred in the context of this discussion.

        Feel free to rant though brother. Get it all out. I would hate for you to be pulled over for a broken tail light and go off on a cop like this. LOL

        • Dave

          So there was no possible way of determining where “home” was after you told the gun-confiscators to go there? Once criminals leave the city limits, they’re home free? Is that what you’re saying?

          And truly, I didn’t ignore anything. Did I say you personally should have placed anyone in custody? That would be nonsensical if you didn’t witness the gun confiscations, as you’ve repeatedly made clear.

          See, this is the problem average citizens encounter when a conversation about police powers takes place. Cops assume accusations of abusive policing are directed at them, personally. So the conversation is non-productive (sic) and civil rights violations get downplayed because, hey, you weren’t the one doing it and you’re not a bad guy so who are we to judge, etc. etc. etc. etc.

          Your profession is insufficiently accountable. You admit that people who abused their authority to commit armed robbery against citizens in New Orleans were simply told to “go home.” You admit that you are “self-policing”, which is a recipe for abuse of power. Maybe you’re a good cop. I don’t know. But for pity’s sake stop thinking that people who want to make structural changes to law enforcement for the sake of civil liberties are just doing it because they hate cops.

          • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

            Your not grasping the lack of command, control, resources, infrastructure, communication, etc., and I am failing to properly convey it to you in a manner you can grasp. My apologies.

            You said. “Oh wow, you told them to go away.” Sorry, I was taught in college that YOU referred to ME when engaged in a discussion. Not sure where I downplayed civil rights violations, but you do not seem very concerned with the actual substance of my article, rather you just want a target to rail against.

            If your intelligence was matched with your assumptions, we would have something to work with.

            I guess you missed the part where I said I agree with most of what you posted as well right?

            SOrry, guess your just one of those guys.

        • http://gravatar.com/pascobear pascobear

          Brannon, I was there, in Biloxi. People have no idea, absolutely no idea the situation, the death, the destruction, the despair, the chaos. Until it happens to Dave, he will not comprehend what you are saying.

  • steve clark

    Good article. Thank you for your thoughts and memories. While some will brainlessly rail against the govt for any perceived evil or encroachment of rights, things have to be taken in context. It’s not always a 100% black and white case; more often than not, it’s a very grey case. I can’t imagine going through what you guys did down there.

  • icepick37

    Thank you for sharing this. It’s very informative. Keep putting the truth out there! :)

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      no problem. Thanks for the support.

  • Bart

    Two questions for the author who may/may not have info to share:

    1) Do you have details or specifics on the actions of the California Highway Patrol as regards confiscation? There seems to be significant info on the CHP being a primary actor in confiscations.

    2) If this was as minimal as you present in your firsthand viewpoint, please explain the successful NRA court action to get nearly 1000 firearms restored to the owners by NOPD.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      1) I do not remember them specifically. Remember, I witnessed NON-confiscations, not actual confiscations.

      2) 1000 firearms does not equal 1000 people violated. Hell, if it were me, I would account for 10%-20% of that number. LOL

      Seriously though, obviously some of that is multiple firearms from multiple people. ALso I think we had around 400k-500k people in the general NOLA area, so let’s just say 250-500 people, in the grand scheme of things, that is not a lot. One in too many, but less than .02% is not “widespread”.

      I witnessed, and personally participated, in many encounters with armed people where the firearm was never discussed.

      I also think some of those firearms were taken, or relinquished, when people got on the transit buses out of the city.

      We can chase that cat tail if you want, but when they had to rely on the government to get them out because they failed to evacuate (elderly and handicapped aside), then they kinda put themselevs at the mercy of the rules at that time. If you are not paying attention, run out of gas, and I offer you a ride, then I kind of get to pick what is on the radio station.

      It is not like all, or even most IMO opinon, of the guns that were taken, were confiscated by force. Many were left when people boarded buses out of the city.

      SOmething to think about.

  • Hogs

    I am retired LEO of 25 years. In my experience, I believe the actions of the Officer have a lot to do with where they work. A city cop associates guns with gangbangers and wants guns off the street. A country cop associates guns with hunting and self defense and typically wants honest citizens to be armed.
    In an SHTF situation, as a private citizen, I would lie through my teeth. “No, Officer, I don’t have any weapons.”, followed by “No, Officer, I can’t invite you in the house. I will step outside to talk to you.”, and “No, Officer, I do not give permission for a search.”

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Hogs, thanks for chiming in. Generally speaking, i would agree with you. Areas with more gun crime tend to have more gun fear. Makes perfect sense.

    • jla

      “In an SHTF situation, as a private citizen, I would lie through my teeth. ‘No, Officer, I don’t have any weapons.’, followed by ‘No, Officer, I can’t invite you in the house. I will step outside to talk to you.’, and ‘No, Officer, I do not give permission for a search.'”

      AS WOULD I!!! Not only that, but I would keep most of my firearms well hidden, and I would also keep one firearm–something cheap that I really wouldn’t mind losing all that much, a HiPoint 9mm for example–where any officer doing an illegal search would find it relatively quickly. Then I would bitch loudly & incessantly about them taking my ONLY gun and leaving me defenseless! In my experience people, including cops, don’t want to deal with someone who won’t stop bitching at them and tend to leave as soon as they can.

      There is risk associated with this tactic of course. (There is with any tactic.) Finding one gun could lead a LEO who is really gung-ho about confiscation to decide there must be others around as well, but that’s one of the reasons for choosing a cheap gun to be the sacrifice. Someone who doesn’t care about guns but maybe wants to have one around anyway, ‘just in case’, is likely to have something cheap. The guy who is packing a $1,200 1911, on the other hand, is very likely to have a few more guns around. Besides, if you’re have to lose a gun it’s better to lose a cheap one!

    • Steven Weeks

      Hogs, first i’d like to thank you for your service to your community. But I would like to comment on the second part of your post about not letting in any LEO’s into your home post SHTF. The people in Watertown Mass DID NOT have the option of NOT letting in LEO’s when they banged on your door and preceded to tell the occupants that they were coming in no matter what. Not only that, but LEO’s were also pointing there AR-15’s and M4’s at people simply for taking there picture through a window. Yes, this happened in the very liberal Northeast (Mass) but I think the pictures coming out after that (local) SHTF really changed the way many feel about LEO’s in general.

  • Risky

    When the NOPD Police Superintendent says during a press conference, “No one will be able to be armed. We will take all weapons.” that just throws out any cockamamie theory that just a few ‘bad eggs’ were confiscating weapons on their own accords. It was intended to be systemic and complete whether or not it was actually performed on a large scale.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Risky,

      Please read what I actually wrote. It is not a theory, it is what I personally witnessed. Likewise, if you think cops listen to everything a CHief says…LOL

      He also quickly recanted that once it made national news, but nevetheless, think what you like.

      • Risky

        Oh, I read the article in its entirety. Understand my point, though. I was /not/ saying that confiscation actually took place on a large scale. I was saying that the chief and mayor had every intention for it to take place, although it didn’t fully materialize. Your article insinuates that main reasons some guns were confiscated were just due to out of area/state personnel and a few ‘bad eggs’ in the NOPD. It completely ignores these very clear (and public) decrees from the top. The intent was still there regardless of whether or not they recanted sometime after public pressure to do so.

        The fact is that confiscation orders /were/ given at some point and some unknown number of police officers (which was likely more much than just a handful) followed through with those directives. While your article may not be a theory, it is still anecdotal… just like all of the other accounts we’ve heard of rather widespread abuses, mostly from those on the receiving end. Despite your level of placement, one account of /not seeing/ it happen doesn’t take away from the hundreds of accounts of police confiscating firearms from otherwise law-abiding citizens post-Katrina.

        • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

          hat I am directly saying, not insinuating, is that despite the fact that the Chief and Mayor called for basically a confiscation, (which was in reference to people out and about, not door to door, but nevertheless) what ACTUALLY happened was that the majority of the LEO’s from the area and visiting ignored those orders. Period.

          What confiscations did occur were obviously in compliance with the orders given, but were the exception in spite of the orders and not the rules.

  • Charles

    Fantastic article! Thank you for sharing your insight and experiences.

  • Lew

    This was a very interesting piece. I have to say I never knew it was that bad in New Orleans, over here in Europe the story really didn’t get reported after the first week or so.

  • Jared

    Great article!

    I live in the Socialist republic…err.. state of california and in earthquake territory where the possibility of a large earthquake could cause a WROL situation. In the event of this, and LEOs and national guard are “not so honorable” what is the proper way to address this? As a prior Marine, I am very sympathetic toward the military and our police officers as they serve a vital function, but i will be damned if one of the confiscated a $2000+ rifle of mine… how would you handle a not so honorable LEO who are demanding to confiscate your firearms?

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      That is a tough call. There comes a point when you have to know when to hold em and know when to fold them. Five dudes at your door with guns is not the time to get in a shoot out. If reason is out of the question, you really have no option but to hand over “some guns”. I cannot really answer it. I know I would not fight at that moment unless I thought I could win. Afterwards, i would plan my attack ro withdrawl.

  • Joe

    Great article! We all know things happen that shouldn’t. I personally thank you for your service as well as for this article. It’s a great account of things that happened (or didn’t) by someone that went through an unimaginable situation and held their head high, kept their integrity, and made the best of the situation at hand.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks sir.

  • Gee William

    Great read Brannon, thank you for taking the time to do the write up and to stick around for the Q&A. Sadly tho, it was enough to warrant Congress to pass the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act (which is comical, since we already have the Second Amendment, there really isn’t supposed to be a need for additional laws saying the same thing). I think that while it’s reassuring to see accounts like yours and know that it wasn’t as wide spread as let on, that doesn’t mean it can’t happen. Historically speaking, the formation of a Stasi or Saddam’s Republican Guard, who’s troops/officers are loyal to a single individual has happened and can happen without vigilance on all our parts. It’s why our LEOs, MIL and Elected officials swear an oath to the law, ie. our Constitution and not the President as a check to help prevent it from happening. I think you’d agree with that.

    btw, loved your tactical use of light video from the 2A Shoot with Cory and Erika, really informative. Would love to attend one of your classes at some point in my life.

    Keep up the great MAC crew and thanks for all your service man.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks for the kind words!

  • JimRed

    “The rules are that if you come for my gun, you will die. The cops that decide to “follow orders” will figure out the rules real quick. The political powers will be powerless without the pawns to carry out their bidding.”

    We would prefer not to have to shoot police, who in my mind are just working guys like us. But we do want to go 1776 on THOSE WHO GIVE THE ORDERS to confiscate our weapons or otherwise violate us. Assuming that your local Chief of Police is getting orders, from whom would they most likely come?

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      I would think it would be initiated, driven, and supported from the feds. The funny thing is that the feds are small, even with the military. if enough Chiefs and Sheriff’s refuse, there is not enough logistical manpower to make it happen.

      I seriously do not see a fulll blown confiscation ever happening here. Slow erosion of rights until gun ownership is impractical, but door to door, never.

  • Sam

    If I may ask, after reading through the article… What was the atmosphere like right after Katrina? Ill be honest, I can tell when to hold n fold. I am wondering where officers under-equipped sometimes to handle tasks so they may have confiscated those arms to use during that time? I am just wondering.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      It is very difficult to place a finger on “after Katrina”. To some degree, there are still affects of it being felt.

      The closest things got to “normal”, which is still abnormal in NOLA, would be about a year after.

      I would not think that if any officers took guns because they needed them, it was more than a handful.

  • TexasTopCat

    Thank you for the article, it is informative. Now, there were lots of mistakes in lots of places and I do not think that any would not agree. I think that even the narrow scope that you claim on the gun confiscation, there were serious violations where citizens lost the ability to protect themselves and their property. I would have liked to have seen the people that participated and the people who gave such orders in prison for good long times.
    The things that I took away from your statements are:
    1) Police that live and are accountable to the local community are probably more likely to do reasonable actions.
    2) Military, Federal Agents, and outside Police can not be trusted to not blindly follow orders.
    3) This event was caused by mother nature, but a similar event could be manufactured by our government at will and used as an excuse to remove citizen resistance.
    4) Most of us do not value gun ownership enough, until it is too late

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      I agree. i would like to see the Chief of Police, Mayor, and Governor in jail for a lot of things.

      1. Yep

      2. Yep

      3. Yep

      4. Yep

  • http://snafu-solomon.blogspot.com/ Steve

    the battle against the occupying police forces has begun. at least in Kentucky. recommend all LEOs to declare their intentions with regards to gun rights and other important issues. just my advice but this will probably spread. don’t hate me, i’m just the messenger.

    http://www.lex18.com/news/threats-made-against-bardstown-police-department

    • John Dillinger

      In your time there were you ever directly involved in a shooting? If so, what were the circumstances? I have a few friends with crazy stories, what’s yours?

      • http://snafu-solomon.blogspot.com/ Steve

        not really your business and that has nothing to do with the news that was posted.

        i’ve been waiting for someone to go operational against police forces. a poor economy, a focus on divisive social issues and finally a strike against gun rights —especially in rural areas? quite honestly it almost seems like this is the type of reaction that was planned.

      • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

        Not appropriate to share those kinds of stories in this setting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kevin.ocallaghan.7777 Kevin OCallaghan

    Nice write up!
    I’m a local as well as an insurance agent in a N.O. suburb as well as a flood victim. From what I experienced and from the people I encountered Brannon is spot on. I don’t think its possible to convey the utter devastation that occurred. No power, water, gas, traffic lights, or businesses open for weeks. Stories of police departments running out of ammo and having to resupply from other departments.Officers carrying personally owned AK’s and M1 Carbines. No batteries for flashlights while patrolling in a pitch black city. Many officers were working 18 hour days in water up to their chest that contained sewage and chemicals (gas, oil, and diesel mostly from flooded cars) in the early days just trying to rescue people.
    I think the most telling thing about how devastating Katrina was is happening now. Whenever I meet someone new in New Orleans conversations run a pattern. Where did you grow up, what schools, food (N.O. is always about food!), and what happened to you in Katrina. We’re 8 years later and its still one of the first things we discuss. That being said due to my job I’ve discussed Katrina with in excess of 2000 people. I have yet to meet one that had a firearm confiscated in Katrina personally. Not saying it didn’t happen but it couldn’t have happened frequently. The only problem I heard was from people trying to enter a shelter with a firearm. They had to surrender them to get into the shelter. After the guns were in that water they would have needed a lot of work anyway…
    Thanks for the write up Brannon. NOPD really should release the call logs for Katrina, it would be a great read!

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks. There are no real call logs for the worst part of Katrina. FOr about a week, every single LEO, fireman, EMS, etc was on one single radio channel. It was basically constant yelling and screaming and chaos. No way to even use the radios. After about an hour, your battery was dead with little opportunity to recharge.

  • Slovko

    Brannon LeBouef – Thank you for sharing your story with us. As someone with a lot of curiosity but no real understanding of the events, this was extremely enlightening for me.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thank you. Glad to share. It is just as important we know what did not happen as well as what did. The wrong need to be held accountable, but the good need to be acknowledged.

  • thebronze

    Great article, Brannon!

    Semper Fi!

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks brother.

  • David Williams

    Great article, Brannon. People should appreciate your honesty. Also they should appreciate what you had to do in terrible circumstances. Most people could not walk in your boots.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks brother.

  • John Dillinger

    Sorry if my last post was a bit off topic, I just felt like more background would be a good thing. I figured most of that stuff would be public record anyways. Sorry if I offended you. Where were you stationed at in New Orleans? I can’t think of any bases in New Orleans, but the reserve base on the westbank, is there another? I moved to the north shore two years after Katrina and it has always been something I’m glad to have missed. Lot of brave folks doing hard things in hard times. It’s commendable that you came back, I just hope the Corps didn’t ream your ass too hard for bailing on active duty. I’d assume that would be why you decided to be a contractor, if so, bravo. Doing the right thing is never easy. Thanks for your service.

  • http://gravatar.com/armedmochris Chris Shoffner

    Good read, Brannon. I’m not going to try to engage in an argument with you about what was “right or wrong” about these confiscations like some folks here have attempted to do, because I believe that is outside of the scope of what your article set out to address – which was YOUR PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIENCES (not sure why so many have had such a hard time grasping that). I’ll just leave with saying I believe you are a good guy with a lot of integrity and that we would all be better off if more of our fine folks in law enforcement shared your high personal standards. All the best, bro.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks Chris.

  • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

    I was at the Division Headquarters on Dauphine and Poland on the river. It was also the MEPS for all services for this side of MS river.

    Most of what happened during Katrina is not public record…. there were no records for about a month or so.

    Let me be clear, and I hope your insinuation was a slip and not some slight-handed inference, or trolling under the veil of innocent ignorance, but I did not bail on active duty. I was also literally the last Marine to leave NOLA (almost got in trouble for that BTW) and the first Marine back onto that facility. That was only because I was able to get through all the checkpoints with my LEO creds and due to my billet at the time had a need based on the classified nature of some of the gear and systems I worked with.

    That is not why I decided to become a contractor.

  • Winston Smith in TN

    Brannon,
    Thank You for your service, both mil and LE. As you can know and the rest can see from many of the above comments, it is a mostly thankless job. Your thoughts and experiences jive with what I know of LE and mil folks in TN. Always good to read it again tho.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks

  • http://texags.com UTExan

    Excellent article; what is lost on many is the cultural difference between northeastern/west coast urban LEOs and the LEO’s from the south and west with regard to the 2nd Amendment. That is largely at the crux of our relationship between the agencies and the communities they serve

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      yes, that is a very salient point. There was a lot of “Wow, that is how you guys do things?” From both sides of the line.

  • James Holmes

    Hi Brannon, and thanks – putting up your thoughts will always lead to all the wingnuts coming loose. Doesn’t matter if all you say is “I like pancakes” there’s someone out there in on the internet that will take exception to it.

    I’m a small town LE type as well. What I got from it was:

    1. Command and control were non-existent – interdepartment communications was non-existent.
    2. In your neck of the woods you saw little of the alleged wrongdoings, what you witnessed was what you witnessed. It is hard to understand exactly what your AO was.

    I knew a few dozen private types that worked in NO during and after the storm. They had some interesting stories to tell about confrontations with NOPD while on assignment. They were universally amazed at the large out-of-state law enforcement presense, very few of which were put under the command of Lousiana peace officers. Same for national guard troops. They said the were fired upon equally by unidentified snipers and official peace keepers of one stripe or another. The only instance they cited of attempted confiscation came from a California based LE contingent. In their little world they said things were quiet, but their clients (who had bugged out) were the wealthy in a particular gated neighborhood.

    If you watch TV news and expect the actual truth to ever be told, you’re living in an especially rich fantasy world. Unfortunately, millions of americans watch TV and take it as gospel. Same for internet reporting. It is seldom that there is any politics-neutral reporting going on, else they wouldn’t have a fan-base and their ad revenues would diminish. Liberals are going to find “horrific” instances of abortions being denies during Katrina, and Conservatives are going to find “horrific” instances of abortions being performed during Katrina. Ick.

    About all I do know is that our police agencies are getting militarized without any hue and cry coming from our elected local leaders. If/when any form of confiscation is attempted, I think we need to look to the model used by Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe (Rhodesia), entirely bypassing the local law enforcement agencies.

    There are very real problems we have to address concerning our freedoms, and we damn well shouldn’t let any newshound direct our attention to any particular area, because it’s the area that’s not being examined where the worst abuses and infringements are occurring.

    take care

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Thanks for taking the time to reply.

      And yes… the wingnuts are flapping. LOL

  • James

    About Realities point #7: I know from personal experience that Blackwater “mercenaries” did in fact patrol the streets and they were not involved in any way with the confiscation of privately owned weapons. Does this mater? Probably not, but for me it compromises the integrity of the author. He may not be misleading readers intentionally but it goes to show that he is not as informed as he would like you to believe.

    • http://www.nolatacforum.com Brannon LeBouef

      Actually I think it shows you take things too literally and you think in absolute terms.

      Also I think it displays your lack of reading comprehension and general common sense as I am relaying my experiences and most people understand without the statement having to be qualified that I was not at every point in space and time concurrently. Never mind the fact that in “realities #7″, I used the term primarily which most people understand to mean the majority.

      Furthermore, the use of the “mercenary” term makes the statement a compound which means you would have to believe that the people who were from Blackwater and were patrolling were also mercenaries.

      Or it could be that you are in fact not telling the truth or do not know what you think you know.

      Perhaps you should take the time to write down what your experiences were as well as the context.

      You also may want to know who you are speaking about before you call their integrity into question, especially in light of your lack of compelling facts to prove otherwise.

  • Pingback: Gun Confiscation During Katrina «()

  • Grendel6.5

    This was, if nothing else, a great learning experience for handling a SHTF scenario. Mistakes were made, but much was learned. LEO are humans and as such are subject to human tendencies both good and bad. I have good friends who are LEO. Most LEO are good folks but there are exceptions. There will continue to be an erosion of gun rights that will make door to door confiscation unnecessary. Good article from a gentleman who saw it up close. Thanks!

  • honestbeing

    First I must convey my appreciation for your military service. I am grateful to all military for their work, especially though the USMC who are so few and seem to do the dirtiest, most dangerous jobs. I appreciate your article and account of the event. Mr. LeBouef I noticed in your article you have mentioned where you mentioned “it is not the widespread gun confiscation that is depicted in the media pieces”. I certainly do not trust all of the info they report. I watched a lot of coverage by the TV media and listened to news based radio. I never saw or heard one story covering the order to confiscate firearms. Im sure they were there, but I am surprised as I only learned of this through the internet news sources and recently.

    I was also surprised to learn where the order originated from. I at first strongly believed that it had to come from very high in the chain of command, at least the federal level. I am also surprised that Police Superintendent Eddie Compass has not been investigated by the feds
    (example Dept of Justice) for civil rights violation/s simply for giving that order. I can not understand the mentality of such a vague order that would remove a citizens ability to protect their lives when they are legally possessing firearms on their own property. Obviously they posed no threat to authority or control of the situation.

    I appreciate the input on your view of LEOs. Specifically their integrity. When I was young here in Florida I had great respect for LE. As years passed all branches seemed to become more and more aggressive, rude and less likely protect us or value citizens rights.
    Its as if their roles have changed entirely to that of only there to make any contact with a citizen an opportunity to create, interpret or insinuate an arrestable crime. I see video accounts of unacceptable behavior by officers while another stands by and does nothing.

    There has been a great increase in crimes since then and I am sure their training and tactics along with attitudes have changed. I have very little trust, respect or belief in a majority of officers ability to carry out their duties in a professional manner. I feel that there are only a small percentage that maintain a high level of integrity and professionalism.
    I feel this behavior is mostly due to policy and training. Your opinion has given me a positive oriented hope that I am wrong about LE.

    I also appreciate you sharing your experience, especially in regards to the firearms confiscation aspect. I truly believe that military and LE should have more emphasis
    during their training and throughout their careers on the importance and value of
    the oath they have sworn to uphold.

  • Barry

    As a 22 year Police Officer and responsible gun rights proponent, I have to say I was ashamed at the obviously unlawful confiscation of firearms that DID occur, in LARGE numbers after Katrina (over 1000 were confiscated, according to the follow up Federal Investigation). And while it is true that much was done by outside agencies there to assist, to say it was “nowhere near as widespread as some would have you believe” when there were over a thousand taken is a bit misleading. Now, maybe there were other reasons to confiscate the guns in some of the situations; however, the ones done IN FRONT OF THE NEWS CAMERA were definitely NOT lawful. They had not been used in a crime, they were not possessing them unlawfully, the Officers did not have a court order and there was no law they were confiscating under; it was simply, “we’re collecting all guns”. The old woman tackled was INSIDE HER OWN HOME and in NO WAY threatened the Officer with the firearm. Unfortunately, if the ones in FRONT of the camera were handled that way, I get my an unpleasant idea of how the other situations away from cameras were handled.
    .
    I’m in Florida, where there are over 1 million concealed firearm permit holders. Because of this, I run into people lawfully possessing firearms every day. I have yet to ever have tackle a person that was in LAWFUL possession of their firearm.
    .
    In 22 years of Law Enforcement, I have been ordered to do many things I wasn’t happy about, didn’t agree with and/or didn’t want to do; however, ALL of those orders were still LAWFUL orders, despite my personal opinion of them. The gun confiscations, however, was different. It wasn’t simply distasteful or disagreeable; it was illegal. And if I was instructed by my Department or Supervisor to ILLEGALLY seize the firearms of US Citizens, who were lawfull in possession of them, absent any criminal activity and without a court order, I would have absolutely REFUSED to comply with that UNLAWFUL order. The oath of office we all take as LEO’s comes BEFORE our allegiance to our Agency or supervisor. To say anything else is an offense against the law enforcement profession.
    .
    I am not a prepper or a doomsday fanatic. However, as what I consider to simply be a responsible citizen that lives in a hurricane zone, I have a large pantry that I keep stocked with enough food/water to last a few weeks, not years, just weeks. Unfortunately, because of the actions of these law enforcement officers that apparently forgot that whole “lawful order” thing, I now have added a completely hidden closet in my house where my gun safe now resides. Short of reviewing the architectural drawings of the house, no one would know it is there. Being a police officer, I probably wouldn’t have had to worry up in New Orleans, they probably would’ve checked my ID and moved on; however, I will be retired in a couple years and its better to be prepared than not.

  • panopticonisi

    thank you for throwing a BS flag on thisnarticle’s apologist spin.

  • Pingback: Gun confiscations during an emergency:What should you do?()

  • trailrunner78

    Shoot them.

  • trailrunner78

    5 dudes all standing at my door are going to wither under the hail of 30 rounds of 7.62mm AP coming their way as fast as I can pull the trigger. There is NFW I would surrender anything to anybody under the circumstances we are discussing, and quite frankly they would not wind up at the front door unless they had already ignored the sign advising that anyone crossing the property line with a weapon would be shot dead.

    • Dudazz

      Congrats, you’re a dangerous lunatic.

      • trailrunner78

        See above reply to sldfkj. In addition: No, I’m a survivor with a military background who has carried a firearm for a living much of my adult life. (including time as a LEO)

        You obviously are a civilian in every sense of the word.

    • sldfkj

      trailrunner78…Securing America’s Freedoms, one dead, confused pizza delivery driver at a time.

      • trailrunner78

        You’re a dumbass. First of all, I didn’t order any pizza. Secondly, they don’t send 5 pizza delivery drivers for 1 pizza. Thirdly, pizza delivery drivers don’t dress up as cops. Your reply was just stupid, and you owe disqus an apology for wasting their bandwidth.

  • Robert Guilfoyle

    Look what happens at 3m 10 sec
    http://www.youtube.Com/watch?v=Zd8q_rvcAP4

    • dudazz

      Have you read the end text in red? What a complete pile of stupid redneck BS.

      • OldNorthState

        The tonality and phraseology of your comments pretty much tells all the rest of us just what a liberal apologist waste of oxygen you are. You’re the type who’ll be the first to step ahead of women and children to save your own skin when something hits the fan. Go back to sleep… maybe you won’t wake up to help vote in another socialist/communist/Marxist regime. We hold you and your ilk responsible for our nation’s ills.

  • Pingback: The 2nd Amendment - Page 14 - PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum()

  • Leila

    Thank you for clearing that up. It’s the most rational accounting I have heard thus far. I would like to thank the National Guard for their hard work during the storm. It’s nice to know there are rational people out there. I would also like to thank all the security companies that responded, and the rescue people and the electric men/women and anyone that I missed. I am not from the area, but was distressed to hear that so much was going on and that they turned it into a Bush bashing contest. It’s easy for them to say when they aren’t doing anything to help. I worked with a contractor on the Texas side, we sent in supplies, I helped order them and trust me, we were getting them there as quickly as we could get shipments into the area.

  • http://nortonzone.symantec.com/ Pike Juan

    “the wingnuts are flapping.” … Irony by Brannon LeBouef.

  • Shane Shaw

    there is far too much evidence to the contrary that police will confiscate your firearms given any excuse. You’ll be lucky to get it back if you do. Time after time, nearly every day, we see some new evidence of LEO abusing their authority. You have lost the public trust, what was once “to protect and to serve” has now become “to contain and control”, there will be a backlash and it won’t be pretty.

  • Andy Robinson

    If I understand correctly, you are saying that the scale of confiscation was less than you perceived the media was making it out to be, and that many or most officers refused to carry out the order to confiscate weapons. I can get behind that. Too many people make sweeping generalizations: “we saw this on video, and therefore all LEOs behave that way.”

    But the order itself, recanted or not, is a big problem. And 1,000 weapons being seized without receipt (many of which, as I understand it, never returned) is a pretty big problem in and of itself. You are flooded out, waiting for help, and the first responder walks or floats or flies to you and says “give me your guns; then we’ll help” and when asked for a receipt says “no.” Sure, the scale of this should not be exaggerated but should not be soft-pedaled, either.

    The police claimed they didn’t have any weapons, then revealed, yeah, we
    have over a thousand of them (this _could_ have been an honest mistake,
    but probably not). One guy talked about having a WWI (WWII) German Mauser confiscated that was not returned after several attempts. Such a weapon might be worth tens of thousands of dollars, depending on the model and condition.

    Being a member of what I call the Tin Foil Hat Brigade (TFHB) is not helpful: people view TFHB members as alarmist and paranoid. They call “wolf” or “the sky is falling” too many times for people to take them seriously. But do not trivialize the Katrina/NOLA confiscations: at the very least , they are an example for others of what NOT to do in a SHTF/WROL situation.

  • Anthony Maldonado

    Great article and it is very accurate. I was there doing contract security for American Maritime We were LE from out of state and worked at Fema site and Ports. We didn’t do mobile patrols. Being from Detroit I want to thank the deputy from St. Bernard Parish that helped me deal with an upset Cajun, it would have not went well without him .
    This isn’t bs. It was a true account of what happened. The crime was unbelievable. The criminals were shooting at church groups, red cross vehicles, utility workers etc. I will say this the good people down there were amazing. They definitely outweigh the bad.
    Tony

  • Patrick S

    The author is weaseling out by saying no ‘LARGE-SCALE’ confiscations were made. ANY confiscation of legally owned guns is too much. They removed the means of honest gun owners to protect themselves and their property because criminals had guns also. Criminals will always have guns because they are criminals. They don’t care what the law says.

  • JohnParsons22

    Just curious, if not that many guns were confiscated, then can you explain why a year later NOPD still had over 1000 firearms in shipping containers and in 2008 more than 900 remaining were melted down at East Jordan Iron Works? I was there and watched it with my own eyes.

  • Sterling Fordham

    Great article, and thank you for your account

  • dedanann

    Do you realize how stupid you sound? “I didn’t witness it so it didn’t really happen despite the film coverage of it.. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!”

  • dedanann

    It came out in court that they had confiscated 1000 firearms.. I would call that widespread.

  • dedanann

    “I didn’t see it, so it didn’t happen!”

  • Wynrotar

    the firearm confiscation was an illegal fascist order executed by mindless grunts

    the country is full of them

  • Tim Tonole

    Note all it would take to ignore his oath to the constitution is a court order…

  • Pvblivs

    You make the argument that it wasn’t as widespread as some people claimed. I don’t know how widespread it was. But it doesn’t matter. Once is unacceptable. You claim that it was primarily “out-of-state” law enforcement. But law enforcement in any state should not have the attitude that it is acceptable to confiscate people’s guns. The Second Amendment applies on a national level, not on a state-by-state basis.

    It is my general observation that police officers do not see themselves as citizans first. They see themselves as a special group, not subject to the same constraints as the “unwashed masses.” They are hardly unique in this. There are many groups that consider themselves “special.” But this is aggravated by things like police having “immunity” for their actions.

    I do not trust our government (or any government, for that matter) not to engage in a widespread confiscation. And the scope can be made to look narrower than it really is by having a database of all gun owners. This is not something to downplay. It is serious. And it should be regarded as a trial run.