Reality Check for the “Only Cops Need Guns” Crowd

Why You Should NOT Count on the Cops to Save You - The Ugly Truth About Law Enforcement Officer to Citizen Ratios

There are those who say only the cops should have guns.  To them, the idea of individual citizens owning guns is frightening.  They cannot fathom why any normal person would want to own one of those “death machines” that only “belong on the battlefields”.  Those anti-gun people feel the way they do because they have bought into the lie that has been fed them for so long, the lie told by those in positions of authority that do not want an armed population, the lie that says “the cops will be there to protect you, you do not need guns.”   To the gun control advocates, to the people who think that no citizens should own guns, or at least no semi-auto guns, to the people who place their safety and the safety of their family solely in the hands of law enforcement, to you I say: You have MUCH more faith in law enforcement than I do, and I am a law enforcement officer.

Before anyone gets upset, that is not meant as a disparaging remark directed at law enforcement. Despite what the media and some others would have you believe, cops as a whole are good people and they really do care about what happens to most of the population (criminals pretty much excluded).

When-seconds-count-police-are-minutes-awayWe’ve all heard the saying, “When seconds count, the cops are only minutes away”.  Well sadly, it really is just that simple.  Let me explain to you my lack of faith in their ability to save me when seconds count. My lack of faith is based on staffing numbers, crime statistics, and as Bill Clinton likes to say, “Arithmetic”.

For a broad, well known example, I will use a large city that we are all familiar with. One with a HUGE police force, and one in which the mayor is notably VERY anti-gun, New York City. The NYPD is one of the largest police organizations in the United States. I just checked their official website and according to that, the NYPD currently has approximately 34,500 cops. That is a huge number by any stretch of the imagination. BUT, let’s put that number in perspective. According to the most recent available census data (2011), NYC is 468 square miles and has a population of 8,244,910 people. Now for some arithmetic: 8,244,910 / 34,500 = 239 citizens per cop. That is a phenomenal cop to citizen ratio. I honestly have never seen any agency with such a good ratio. I have tried to look at the NYPD’s divisional/staffing breakdown to figure out how many of those cops are actually street cops, and not administrators, detectives, property personnel, trainers, etcetera, but I cannot find those types of numbers anywhere.

For a specific example, I will look at an agency I am quite familiar with, but cannot name. Said agency serves a large metropolitan city with an equal distribution of urban development and rural area, covering 836 square miles. In that 836 square mile area, the population as of 2010 was 618,962. That population is served by a law enforcement agency that has 2017 total number of sworn cops. Taking that total number of cops, let’s do some math: 618,962 / 2017 = 306.8 citizens per cop. Not bad, not NYPD, but not bad. But now lets break that down to the real numbers.

Of those 2017, many work in the jails (far more work in corrections than any other area), the courts, the airport, administrative jobs and other various details. The actual number of cops assigned to patrol duties, the people that respond to calls for service, is a whopping 291. Here comes that old arithmetic again: 618,962 / 291 = 2127 citizens per cop. That’s right, 2127 people for every street cop employed. Now, let’s dissect that even further. Those 291 street cops work 4 days a week, and are split up amongst 5 overlapping shifts. At any time of the day, at least 2 of those shifts are on the street. For mathematical simplicity, I am going to split the number of cops evenly amongst the shifts: 291 / 5 = 58.2 cops. Ok, now take that number and divide by 1.75 (since they work 4 out of 7 days a week): 58.2 / 1.75 = 33.25 cops. Mathematically speaking, at any time of the day, the entire population of this large area is being policed by 33.25 deputies. What does that number work out to now? 618,962 / 33.25 = 18,615 citizens per working street cop.

1019037Let me say again, that is 18,615 people per every working street cop. I can only imagine if we were to examine the NYPD, at least two thirds of their sworn personnel are assigned to duties other than patrol and do not respond to calls for service. National average for citizen/cop ratios is somewhere near 1000 citizens to 1.5 cops, but please remember, those statistics are pure numbers or cops, not the ones working and responding to calls.

Make you feel all safe, warm and cozy inside? Still insist that the cops are better able to protect you and your family than you are?

Let’s look at response times, should you actually have the time to make that 911 call, and actually get the chance to speak to the call taker, and have enough time to explain what is happening to you. The only stats I could find are for the other local agency of similar size and makeup as the one I examined above. The difference is, they have a much smaller area of responsibility (99.2 square miles). Their average response time, from the time the 911 call is answered until a cop was at the scene, was 7 minutes for the highest priority calls. That does not sound like a long time, right? Want to know how long 7 minutes is? Sit in a chair and start a timer. Imagine yourself fighting for your life during that entire time, knowing that at the best, the cops might be there when that timer rings. Now imagine yourself having been armed with your choice of firearm. Statistically, most of the time they are used in self-defense, they are merely displayed scaring off the attacker. Imagine yourself in the other situation, and this person is so intent on attacking you, the sight of a gun does not dissuade them. Do you want that person having their way with you for 7 minutes while you wait for the cops to respond?

I cannot answer those questions for you; I can only tell you that I will always be armed to be better able to protect myself, my family, and anyone else who may need my protection. If you honestly believe that you are not capable or responsible enough to shoulder the burden of arming yourself, then I commend you for being honest, but I ask that you not project your personal decision onto others who are willing and able to do so. That other person may just be the one there to save your bacon one day when you need them.

The next time someone tells you that the cops are the only people that should have guns, feel free to give them an arithmetic lesson!

As always, your questions and comments are welcome.
Be safe out there,
Matt

Matt

Matt is a full time Deputy Sheriff that has been on the job for 17 years. During his time as a LEO he's attended countless training classes and is a court recognized firearms expert. Matt brings a unique perspective to TBS given his LEO experience and life time appreciation of firearms and our 2nd Amendment rights.

More Posts

Follow Me:
TwitterFacebook

  • Rob.G

    Thank you very much, Officer Matt, for your insight, your candor and your service.

    Like most, I actually like cops and truly respect them for all that they do. But I also think that we could get by with fewer cops if more people, especially women, would just take responsibility for their own personal safety and learn to use and carry a firearm wherever they go.

    • Matt

      My pleasure, and thank you, very much appreciated.

  • icepick37

    MATHs. Always love when people are honest. It all comes down to preparation. It’s not really about fear or anything else. It’s about finding tools that will help you be prepared for the pretty much anything that could happen to you out there in the real world.

  • RPM509

    Great article but…wrong audience. We already know this, least the large majority of readers of The Bang Switch are already aware of this. This should be sent out to as much of the ‘other’ media as possible, in the hopes some of them publish or link back to it. A crying shame most can’t figure out the truth in it on their own…

    • MAC

      That’s where you guys come in. Spread this article far and wide.

  • MrDoe

    People who say we don’t need guns because we have police probably also don’t have Fire Extinguishers in their homes because we have a Fire Department. If that’s a risk they want to take, fine, but don’t tell me I can’t own a Fire Extinguisher, or tell me how big of a Fire Extinguisher I can own, based on your faith in the Fire Department.

    Of course, fires take longer to burn down a house than a criminal with a gun needs to end a life. All the more reason to be prepared for such an emergency.

    • Rob.G

      Excellent analogy, MrDoe!

    • Ryan

      Totally agree, great analogy.

    • Matt

      Sounds like someone has listened to Lt. Col. Dave Grossman before… Love that guy! The fire preparation is an excellent analogy.

    • Al

      GREAT analogy, MrDoe! I’ll pass this one on.

  • rVLn-4

    awesome article

  • Nick

    One thing I would have included here is the Supreme Court decision that police are not responsible to save lives even when they DO arrive on scene. One officer may arrive in 7 minutes but how long before backup arrives and they actually start clearing your house? 20 minutes, 30, an hour?

  • Jack Mahan

    I live in a small town bordering a large northeastern city. The average response time for our town department is 20 minutes. On the three times I have had to call them, that is the shortest response time that I have seen. Yes, I am armed.

  • Migx

    Nice article, good points, how i wish that all anti-gun groups would appreciate this words coming from a Police Officer.

  • TJ

    There was a child taken in my small rural town, and the response time was 2 hours. We’re at one end of the county, and there was an incident occuring on the opposite end that started earlier that day. They had to send a unit from a different county. The mother was assaulted and the child was forcibly taken by someone off their medications. Luckily, no one was seriously hurt, and the child was turned back over.

  • Al

    Matt,
    Thank you for your great articles. You make TOTAL sense!!! I’ve been sharing them with my FB friends. Keep up the great work!

  • Angel

    Matt, good article, will share. This is the common sense reasoning pro-gun media figures need to articulate.